6.05.2009

The Dodge Game, Corvettes, and Personal Validation

During my 6th grade year my family took a lot of road trips. And by a lot of road trips, I mean that almost every weekend we were driving to a different city in the American Midwest to accompany my dad on his church visits. Each trip was usually over 50 miles one-way, so, for my brother and me, two rambunctious elementary-aged boys, that usually amounted to between two to five (and sometimes upwards of ten) hours of sitting in the back seat of a car every single weekend. Pestering our parents about our geographic proximity to our destination was quashed rather quickly, so we had to find other ways to pass the time. Car bingo (red Mercedes! Bingo!) and punch-buggying got old pretty fast, which led my brother, in a rare stroke of fourth-grade brilliance, to create the Dodge Game.

The basic idea was pretty simple and allowed anyone who wanted to play to catch on rather quickly. My brother had decided that Dodge Ram trucks were Cool, Dodge Dakota pickups were Really Cool, and the Dodge Durango SUV was Super Cool, so he assigned point values to the sighting of each car - Ram +1, Dakota +2, and Durango +3.

This game kept us occupied for several weekends, each of which was passed with pen and pencil in hand and eyes peeled. The game abruptly (and sadly) came to an end, when, while traveling alone with my dad, we passed a Dodge dealership. I returned home trumpeting my “insurmountable and decisive victory”, to which T.J., while no doubt initially disappointed, kept his composure and resolutely informed me that 1) the game was already over, and 2) Dodges were never that cool.

Well, maybe it didn’t happen exactly like that, but it was pretty close.

I was left to my own devices, but soon recovered and went lusting after Chevy Corvettes because, when you’re eleven, they are pretty much the coolest car around, regardless of year or body style. Before long I had a mental picture book of every Corvette I had seen, and enjoyed calling our the year of every Corvette that sped past. This was a win-win-win situation for me, because I got to feast my eyes on fast cars, yell, and sound knowledgeable about things on which no one would take the time to challenge me, all at the same time.


This (annoying) hobby, though, had another function. It wasn’t just about keeping track of all the cool-looking cars I saw. It was also my way of affirming my American-ness. If spotting cars was cool, then spotting the quintessential American car topped everything else on the road. With each additional Corvette I spotted, I felt more American. I felt that my participation in identifying a cultural icon somehow validated my blond hair and white skin.

I look back at this now and think, “What was the goal I was aiming to fulfill? What did I think this activity would solve.” But that is the wrong question. If fact, that question is unanswerable because the activity of spotting Corvettes, to me as a scrawny sixth-grader, was self-fulfilling. Corvette-spotting made me feel like I belonged. There was certainly some “If I spot one more then I am 5% more American.” type of thinking going on, though one wonders what would happen once I spotted Corvette #25. Maybe I would’ve tattooed a barbed-wire ring around my biceps and or eaten a whole apple pie without chewing it. Who knows. But the point stands that I still felt that I had to, for some reason, validate my whiteness. I could have listened up and piped down, and probably fit in in America and done just fine. Instead I spoke up and acted out.

The Dodge Game turned me on to a preadolescent need that I didn’t know I had. Spotting cars may have been good for my short-term self-esteem, but it certainly didn’t help me realize what the underlying problem was. It was a quick fix, and, like most quick fixes, it didn’t last. I didn’t need validation of my being; I needed reinforcement that who I was, a multicultural kid, was OK and acceptable.

So who’s at fault? I mean, there has to be someone to blame, right? Perhaps, but I can’t think of anyone. Maybe the whole system of missionary home assignment is to blame. Maybe my peers or neighbors are to blame. Maybe God just put me in a strange situation. Whatever the reason, I’m OK with it, because it made me who I am now, a man who knows that personal validation isn’t something that things, places, or even people can give you.



_DZ


submit to reddit

6.02.2009

How I Relate to Movies And Why I Watch Them

I watched a movie called Blue Velvet the other night. Before that, I watched The Fountain. And, sometime this week, it is likely that I will watch both Cool Hand Luke and Intacto. All this movie watching is admittedly unlike me, for I rarely watch movies these days. Lately, though, I’ve been thinking a lot about that - “that” being why I do or do not watch movies. To me, watching movies is a form of cultural study; a medium through which I can forge links to friends and society in general.

I don’t relate to people or life through movies. I imagine that this has more to do with me not watching a lot of TV/movies as a kid and less to do with some lack of cognitive functioning, but I could be wrong. I’ll try to explain. When I watch a movie, I do so either because A) Friends/family/other people are watching it or B) So that I can have knowledge of what others are talking about or referring to or, in the rare case of C) I am re-watching a movie that I enjoy.

I treat movies as a sort of social capital, a way of furthering myself socially through acquisition of shared experience. I don’t really watch movies to think about how the story affects or mirrors my life or how it is a symbol of some relationship present in society or whether or not it was made to make a political statement. I don’t care. I watch a movie to get the plot and the main ideas, and to get an idea of whether I like it or not. I watch movies so that when someone say, “Hey did you see that wicked awesome scene in so-and-so?”, I can reply with “Yeah, but I thought it was too much like the scene in blanky-blank.” I watch movies to talk about them.

The funny thing is that I can trace back to the exact point in my life when I started doing this. It was April 17th, Monday, I was in seventh grade, and I had just watched Raiders of the Lost Ark the weekend before. I thought it was a good movie and was all excited to tell people about it, so at school that day, I went up to a kid named Bob, who I thought was pretty cool, and said, “Hey, I saw Raiders of the Lost Ark the other day. Have you seen it?”

“Pssh, YES,” he scoffed in an eight-grade-cool, almost as if he were offended that I had even entertained the thought that he had not seen it.

“OK, cool,” I said, and that was the end of the conversation.

But that stuck with me. That five second conversation taught me, however inaccurately, that every cool American kid had seen way more movies than I had, and I needed to get on the ball. I needed to play a lot of catch-up if I wanted to be cool, and man, did I ever want to be cool. I clearly needed to watch more movies, and since I didn’t have any precedent for the movie-watching experience, I made up my own. I became comfortable with watching movies alone. After all, I needed to catch up, right? And I couldn’t afford to wait for social situations where I could watch movies with others; I needed to watch them as fast as I could.

I began with renting VHS tapes from my local library. Or, more specifically, watching VHS tapes at the library audio-visual booths. See, Japan is really lax on media regulations, which meant that I, as a twelve-year-old, could rent R-rated American movies (in English, with JP subtitles) from the library as often as I wanted to. I did this relatively often, and the movies were, indeed, usually rated R - partly because general consensus among my peers was that all the “good” movies were R, and partly because I felt that watching any R-rated movie made me socially superior to any of my peers who watched PG-13 ones. This strategy, however, didn’t really work because I didn’t have the social connections to know which movies were “hot” and which ones were “not”, resulting, for the most part, in my watching all of the wrong ones. The cool kids watched MI:2 and Adam Sandler movies; I watched Cocoon and Robocop.

This continued until the 9th grade, when my family subscribed to cable Internet and I discovered P2P filesharing. Suddenly the whole Web was open to me, and I became a downloading fiend. Remember, though, that this was still 2001 and video encoding wasn’t the best. Even when it was, it took so long to download a 1GB+ file through 2001-era networks that P2P usually wasn’t worth it, so most of the movies I watched were either low-quality rips or in-theater camcorder captures (usually one and the same). It wasn’t pretty, but it got the job done - I was still educating myself. The (relative) respectability of the movies improved, too. Now I was watching Fast and Furious, Gladiator, Minority Report, Bourne Identity, and Rat Race (ironically, mostly PG-13 stuff). My family also got cable TV in the Internet bundle, so between the two media I should have been guaranteed social popularity and acceptance.

Hah! like that was going to happen. It turns out that just watching the same stuff as the cool kids do doesn’t make you cool, but I was to learn that a bit later in life. But I need to get back on track, because this essay is about my movie watching, not about how cool I wasn’t.

All this solitary movie watching has been helpful, though, in the sense that, because I didn’t have other peoples’ input during the movie, I was able to form my own honest opinion of it. These opinions, compounded throughout the years, have made me really critical of movies in general. Nowadays I find that very few movies are worth my time, and hence I am less swayed by a group decision to watch a movie I know I don’t like or know I will not like. This is a complete 180 from where I started as a tweener. I now watch movies for my own betterment; not to go with the group and lubricate social niceties. I rate and judge movies based on my own system, which I have distilled into the following four categories.

Movies Not Worth Watching - These movies were a waste of my time, and I would not recommend watching them to anyone that I like. Examples include Reign Of Fire, almost every Adam Sandler movie, Dolemite, The Ladykillers, I am Legend, Hancock, Wolverine, and Equilibrium.

Movies Worth Watching - These are movies that I felt had a good plot/elements/premise, and, even if I didn’t necessarily like said movies, would recommend that others watch them. They were worth watching once through. Examples would be Man on Fire, The Strangers, Wall-E, Ironman, Saw, and Windtalkers.

Movies I Liked - These are movies I enjoyed but can’t bring myself to buy on DVD because I don’t think I will re-watch them enough times. Examples include the LOTR trilogy, Dark Knight, American Gangster, Saving Private Ryan, The Matrix, and Blow.

Movies I Will Buy - An incredibly small number of movies fit into this category. I (effectively) never buy movies that I have not seen, and even then I have to like the movie a lot and be willing to watch it over and over again. This allows me to have a very intimate collection, because if I own movie that means, almost by definition, I have seen it at least three or four times. At this writing I own about 15 movies including Silence of the Lambs, Army of Darkness, Fight Club, Dead Poets Society, Big Fish, Super Troopers, and Zoolander.

I saw Raiders... when I was twelve, and my movie watching was never the same afterwards. Now, nine years and hundreds of movies later, I still watch movies to increase my social capital. I don’t watch them nearly as often or with as much social significance attached, but I still watch a majority of them alone. Maybe I need to stop that and get a life. Maybe I need to cut back and treat movies more as a social activity. Maybe I’m just fine the way I am. But if you ever want to watch a movie with me, you can ask, but please don’t be offended if I refuse to watch it.

I have my reasons.


_DZ


submit to reddit

5.29.2009

The Sims 3 is Leaked! (On Purpose?!)

I don’t know about you, but I am becoming increasingly wary of the legitimacy of “leaked” content these days. Ever since Radiohead’s Kid A was leaked, resulting in the popularity of the band skyrocketing, it seems that these so-called “leaked” albums, movies or video games always end up selling pretty well. Better, perhaps, then they might should have.

Take the latest Wolverine movie, for example. It was leaked, albeit in unfinished form, a full month before it hit theaters. The leak was highly publicized across the Internet and news media and, in my opinion, probably boosted Wolverine ticket sales a tremendous amount. Actually, I saw the movie and that’s the only reason I can come up with as to why it did so well at the box office. It wasn’t a good movie. This begs the question: Was this leak planned just to create hype for the movie? If, by releasing a half-assed version of the movie for “illegally”, the studio could boost public awareness and thus sales, would they? I think they would.

The Electronic Arts game The Sims 3 is another example. An article (via Slashdot) over at Bloomberg.com on May 22nd documents the “leak” of The Sims 3 a full week and a half before its release, scheduled for June 2. I wasn’t even aware that the game was coming out and, now, thanks to media headlines, I know that the game is being “Hit By Piracy Ahead of Sale.” But wait! Is it the full game being pirated? Not according to company spokeswoman Holly Rockwood.

“The pirated version is a buggy, pre-final build of the game. It’s not the full game. Half the world -- an entire city -- is missing from the pirated copy.”

Yet this copy has been downloaded “an impressive” 180,000 times! To me, that’s a huge amount of free publicity for EA. The downloaders are, of course, using BitTorrent, so EA pays exactly zero distributing costs.

And consider the hype over downloading it!

It’s illegal! It’s exciting! You’re a PIRATE! You lawbreaker, you!

I didn’t even know the game existed, and now I desperately want to try it out!

EA would normally have had to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for this publicity, but by intentionally leaking (according to me) an incomplete version of their software, they get all of the publicity - by way of calling “foul!” - and almost none of the negative effects of actually releasing the full thing for free. People are still going to line up to buy the game even if they downloaded it because no one who actually likes the game will settle for less. I’m guessing a huge percentage of those 180,000 will not be playing the leaked copy in two weeks’ time.

What, then, should we as the consuming public do if indeed my theory turns out to be true? Will we tolerate this underhanded marketing technique? After all, if EA did indeed leak their game on purpose, their crying "foul!" would be lying and misleading - a mere stunt to get their game featured in headlines. And that’s really what it’s all about. With so much news and information saturating the Internet, it’s amazing that anything important gets prominently noticed at all. Unless your video game is either incredibly offensive or Duke Nukem Forever, it will almost never see any mainstream press coverage. These companies are desperate for anything, and this just might be the ticket. If it is, though, and this kind of secretly-leaking-incomplete-games activity keeps up, I’m the one who will cry “foul!”



_DZ


submit to reddit

5.26.2009

30 Rock Is Imploding In On Itself, And Says "Good Luck!"

I don't watch a lot of T.V., and now it seems that what little I do watch might become increasingly hard to follow, according to an article in yesterday's Pioneer Press. This article about the popular television shows of today, such as 30 Rock, Big Bang Theory, and Parks And Recreation, bemoans the growing trend of saturating T.V. content with cultural references and in-jokes about other T.V. shows. In other words, television programming is getting its inspiration from other television programming.

This invites a catch-twenty-two; television requires you to watch other television shows so that you can adequately enjoy your favorite television show - i.e. if you want to get all the jokes on 30 Rock, you might need to have a good understanding of the respective plot-lines of The Office, The Simpsons, LOST, and maybe even Tyler Perry's House Of Payne. That's a lot of T.V. watching, and I don't have that much time to devote to T.V.

The main question I think the Pion. Press is posing in all of this is 'are we making content with lasting value?' Will people ten or twenty years from now be able to watch an episode of 30 Rock and have any idea what is going on? Will they get the jokes?

Is our culture, perhaps, creating an unsustainable model of television in which the only way to understand any show is to have watched all of them? If that answer is yes, then I think the causal factors involved are pretty obvious: cultural entertainment glut and media over-saturation. It used to be that the entertainment media was on the outside of the world looking in. Fodder for their shows was real-world events, ideas, and trends. Now the trend has shifted, and commentary about whether or not the plane wreck survivors will even get off the island is just as valid as that about pirate activity off Madagascar. What's real is now on-par with what's entertainment, because the American media thinks that their audience is equally informed about both worlds.




_DZ


submit to reddit

5.20.2009

Shifting Excellence: My Personal History of Failure

Since about the middle of my elementary years up until a few years ago, I had a certain idea of what success meant. It was very clear in my book: there were two types of people. There were people who were the most successful at what they did, and there were people who weren’t. Either you were the best at what you did, or you were less than a footnote in the annals of history. Either you got your pie and and got to eat it, or you were to forget that pie even existed. I got this idea from watching Michael Jordan lead his team to victory in the ‘95-96 NBA playoffs, when it became clear to me that there became two types of basketball players: His Airness, and people who were not quite there. And somewhere inside my little nine-year-old brain I looked at the black dude on the T.V. with his tongue hanging out and said to myself, “Yeah, I can do that,”

That is why I started playing basketball.

And so began a rather dismal series of personal failures that extended well past my high school years. You see, being inspired by someone to do great things is OK. There are obviously a of of successful people in the world who have had good role models. My problem was that I tried to apply the ruler of infinite perfection to everything I did. I was either going big, or going home.

At first I found that this was pretty easy; my social circle was not that big, so all I had to do was to pick obscure interests, be the best at them, and have everyone look up to me. I went to a Japanese public elementary school at which soccer and baseball were the primary sports. Basketball was almost unheard of; more people played dodgeball than basketball. I was already in a private soccer club (because all the cool kids were making their parents shell out $80/month for soccer lessons), but all I really wanted to do was play basketball. Never mind that almost all of my time on the court was spent by myself, or that my arms were too puny to shoot a basketball without cocking the ball behind my head with both hands. Never mind that I was teaching myself basketball by copying what I saw on T.V., working on cool-looking fade-away jumpers and jump-turn-throw-it-over-the-shoulder-up-and-in layups before I could actually shoot a decent free-throw. Free throws were the most boring part of the game on T.V.!

Nonetheless, all of my practice seemingly paid off, and I was the best basketball player in my social circle by 1998. I was baking pies in my own oven.

At least I was, until I moved to America. Man, was I in for a shock. It turned out that in America, some kids had been playing basketball since the first grade. In America, kids had actually played on basketball teams before the sixth grade. In America, I was a scrawny point guard - far from my usual position of towering over my Japanese peers. At best, I was passable for a basketball player.


----

This revelation started a new phase in my life; a phase of no matter what I tried, I could never be the best at it. It’s like when a person who claims to be good at blackjack stumbles upon the "Ultimate Guide to Playing Blackjack" or any comprehensive guide to something, and now has two options - They can memorize all of the card combinations and their probabilities of appearing, all the possible hands, etc - in essence, the entire book - or they can give up blackjack. There is of course a third option, which is being content and still playing because you enjoy it, but instead of realizing this and looking for a new way to do things, I simply solved the problem of perpetual disappointment by shifting activities. Basketball didn’t work out like I had hoped it would, so I switched my focus to academics. I ended up having the highest grade point average in my sixth grade class. Granted, my class at the private Christian elementary school had less than thirty people in it, but that didn’t matter; I was the smartest kid I knew in my age group.

That satisfaction lasted, surprise surprise, until the next year, when I enrolled at the private Christian Academy in Japan. Apparently, at CAJ, the majority of the other white, middle class missionary kids also had parents who valued academic excellence. Now I was stuck in a school in which my peers were smarter than I was and played better basketball to boot. I had to find something new, so I found two things: computers and wrestling. Both activities were outside the mainstream at CAJ. Wrestlers, regardless of how good they performed, were seen as not-basketball players. And computers were for geeks, even in 1999. Both of these pursuits had relatively small followings, making it easy for me to rise to the top and stand out. But even then, I had to make some adjustments. My good friend Joel also liked computers a lot, but he liked Macs. My whole school was full of Macs, so I decided that I could take a shortcut to fame and become fanatical about PCs. Pretty soon, I was the best PC user my age that I knew, and all was right with the universe again.

I could fill a couple more pages with examples of how I shifted interests to something I thought in which I could excel and stand a head taller than the rest. How I moved from acting to sports to more sports to taking different academic interests. How I shaped my music habits, friendships, hobbies, and religious views, all to somehow become the Michael Jordan of that field. To avoid going home, having received no pie.

And I could chronicle the myriad moments that I met “the book”, as it were, of the interests that I pursued. I played the SNK and Street Fighter video games until I learned that I needed to count frames of animation to truly dominate at them. I collected Dreamcast games and accessories until I decided that I wasn’t going to shell out $300 for a collectible edition of a seven-year-old system. I listened to mainstream rock until I heard it on the radio. Then I listened to classic rock until I hear IT on the radio. I moved back to Apple computers once I learned that practically the whole world outside my school was using PCs. The list goes on and on. It’s hard not to look back at my life and see nothing but failure after failure. I graduated high school not really wanting to pursue college because I felt that I wasn’t really good at anything, and college seemed to be for people who were good at things.


--------

I can look back at my developing years and find two things, two activities, in which I found solace from the rat race with which I imagined I had to keep up. These activities were things that I could do and not care about what others thought of my performance - things were I forgot, as it were, that I was supposed to be better than others. The first one was bike riding, and the second was wrestling.

I have been riding bikes my whole life. In Japan biking is an essential way to get around, and the nation probably has a higher percentage of bikes/people than any other in the world. I had four different bikes before I was eight, and was given a 26-inch mountain bike in second grade that I rode then, when I was eight or nine, to after my high school graduation. I took that bike off-roading, down-hilling, commuting, dirt-jumping, and just about anything else you can do with a bike. Riding my bike, especially in my younger years, gave me the freedom to seemingly do anything or go anywhere. It gave me a reason to be out of the house, a reason to go exploring, a reason to do dumb things that could result in bodily harm, or a reason to think I was cool. These are, for the most part, solitary activities, and I attribute my enjoyment of solitude as an adult to the fun I had being alone on my bike as a kid. My silver and purple mountain bike with the blue water bottle, eighteen speeds, and ¥11,200 price tag literally shaped who I am today.

Wrestling was the other activity that allowed me to forget about what others thought of me or where I stood in relation to others. The funny thing is that I was never even really good at wrestling. I only won three (of the eight) tournaments that I wrestled in in middle school, and only won two (one freshman year and one senior year) of the many more that I participated in in my four years on the high school varsity squad. But that amazingly didn’t matter, because I genuinely enjoyed every season that I wrestled. Despite suffering through two hour practices, constantly cutting weight, and being beaten down by more experienced wrestlers, I enjoyed the camaraderie, the feeling of being physically fit, and the satisfaction of having my hand raised at the end of a match, however often that happened. I’m pretty sure I ended my career with a losing record, and I am definitely sure that I lost the last match I ever wrestled. I have every reason to think that wrestling should be included on my list of failures in life, but it’s not. It’s one of my fondest memories. Wrestling was good for me not only as a sport, but as a lifestyle. Because of wrestling I never smoke, drank, or did drugs in high school, (probably correctly) fearing that it would hurt my performance. It helped me establish good habits for when I struck out on my own.

So shouldn’t I have learned something from these two activities? I should have, but I didn’t - at least not at the time. I only realized that I thought like this in the past year or so. Only recently did I slow down and tell myself that it is OK not to be the best at something, that it is OK to just do something because you enjoy doing it. I picked a guitar to learn it twice - once in high school and once after high school. But I didn’t actually want to learn how to play the guitar. I wanted people to think I was cool because I was good at guitar. I was willfully ignorant that becoming good at guitar took years of practice, and I didn’t really want to take then time to learn basic music theory AND guitar at the same time. I just thought that playing guitar was the ticket to being cool. The guitar path to coolness ended up being too hard, so I dropped it. I actually learned from that experience, and every time I entertain the thought of picking up guitar again I remind myself that I already tried that. That lesson has helped in other areas of my life as well.

It’s taken me a long time to even begin to feel comfortable in my own skin, and it hasn’t been easy. But I take it day by day, and, so far, things seem to work themselves out alright. I am becoming a better judge of what I actually enjoy doing and what I think I want to do but actually don’t. I guess this is part of what being an adult means? Well, whatever it is, I think I’m OK with it.


_DZ


submit to reddit

5.19.2009

Ketchup - A Brief History of The World's Greatest Asset


Ketchup is possibly the greatest invention of modern, pre-modern, and post-modern times. The lovely red pasty stuff that you squirt on your burger and fries has been at the forefront of the advance of modern civilization and general morality, but chances are that you are not aware of it! For shame! But have no fear; for this article will follow the history of the condiment known as ketchup and use brilliant anecdotal evidence to prove how ketchup is the source of everything good in the modern universe. Read on, soon-to-be ketchup lover!


Pre-Early 1600 - Ketchup is only known in China. It is unsurprising, therefore, that up until this time there has been war, strife, feudalism, the Crusades, the Inquisition, Cortez committing genocide in Mexico, and many other atrocities in Europe and the New World.

Early 1600s - The Dutch bring back ketchup from China, resulting the the financial success of the Dutch East India Company. Unsurprisingly, in China, the Ming Dynasty that has been dominant since the 1300s fails in the next forty years, eventually ending in 1644. They should not have shared their ketchup.

1700s - It takes a while for Europe to get into the swing of things, but soon the Enlightenment period begins, thanks to the effects of ketchup in increasing human mental capacity.

1727 - Britain has ketchup, and the first recipe for ketchup is printed in Britain. The Spanish want the recipe, but Britain won’t give it to them, so they war for it, sparking the Anglo-Spanish War. Nobody wins, the status quo is unaffected, and Spain goes home without ketchup. British minister John Wesley invents Methodism in celebration. Ketchup actually goes on to fuel much of England’s dominance in the next fifty years or so.

1801 - Benedict Arnold, the American traitor, dies, and the first recipe for ketchup is printed in America. This is not a coincidence. While Britain and France were warring it out in Europe (Britain was mad that the Americans stole their ketchup, and Napoleon was mad because he wasn’t British), America is a budding new country full of promise and smart people like Thomas Jefferson, who came into presidential office that year.

1812 - A better recipe for ketchup was published in America, causing the British, still sore, to try and war against America. America, fortified in large part by ketchup jars passed out in their troops’ rations, beats the Brits back.

1830 - Ketchup starts being sold in bottles, and Emily Dickinson is born. She goes on to write many poems praising the many benefits of ketchup, but these are collected in a tome that has yet to be discovered.

1837 - A man named Jonas Yerkes, a Michigonian, starts selling ketchup in quart and pint-sized bottles. The bigwigs in Washington DC are totally impressed, and unanimously vote to let Michigan become the 26th state of the Union. They need some way to tell Michigan this, so they commission a Mr. Samuel B. Morse to do something about it. The telegraph is invented. Michigan needs a commercial hub out of which to ship their ketchup, so they decide to create a sleepy little township nearby, call it Chicago, and ship ketchup from there.

1848 - Unscrupulous bachelor ketchup bottlers in Wisconsin start adding coal tar to heighten the redness of their ketchup. This results in about 5,000 deaths in New York City. Legislators reprimand Wisconsin, which has yet to achieve statehood, and demand that they stop. Wisconsin agrees and turns their efforts to cheese-crafting, which so impresses lawmakers that they make Wisconsin the 30th US state. All is forgiven and the 5,000 avoidable deaths in NYC are blamed on “rampant and uncontrollable cholera.”

1876 - It’s a big year for ketchup. John’s Hopkins University is created to (indirectly) help sick people. A man named Alexander Graham Bell wants to tell his friend HJ Heinz about this, and devises the telephone. Heinz receives his telephone in the mail, and the two talk for hours on end about how they can help sick people for less money than it takes to found a fancy-schmancy university. Heinz decides that his new recipe for ketchup will make a world of difference, and launches Heinz Ketchup Co. to (directly) make people healthier. Also around this time, General George Armstrong Custer tries to make friends with nearby Indians in Montana but forgets to bring ketchup along. The Indians, incensed at his unbelievable lack of foresight, slaughter him and his group of friends.

1877-1981 - Ketchup starts being taken for granted and drops out of the public eye. Enter WWI, WWII, the Holocaust, and the Vietnam War.

1981 - Ronald Reagan, an actor/president, signs social reform legislation that results in severe problems for homeless people. He also introduces the “trickle-down effect”, which has yet to actually work in real life. Directly related to this is his mistaken idea that ketchup is vegetable suitable for school lunches. Ketchup is clearly a condiment, and an avid supporter of ketchup takes a few potshots at Ronald. Reagan emerges a national hero as the first president to survive an “assassination” attempt.

1992 - After an extended hiatus, A Prairie Home Companion returns to the American airwaves. Its Catchup Advisory Board short skits promote the myriad benefits of ketchup, and the show prospers.

October, 2000 - Heinz introduces ketchup in a variety of fun, colorful flavors. They also make contributions to George W Bush’s political campaign. In the years following, 9/11 happens, the Iraq War commences, and Dem. John Kerry does not become president. Heinz ends the colors in 2006, and two years later Barack Obama is elected the first black president of the United States. Progress!, and proof that ketchup needs to stay red.


Man, if that doesn’t prove how great ketchup is, I don’t know what does. If fact, if you still don’t believe that ketchup is awesome, I think you need to scroll up and read the timeline again. Ketchup is so awesome that I buy it in bulk. If the local Restaurant Depot ever has too much ketchup it’s because “that guy didn’t come in this week”. Now if you’ll excuse me, I have to go grocery shopping for things to eat with my ketchup.




Dann writes out of his home in Minnesota and owns every color of ketchup, but only for collector’s value.





submit to reddit

5.18.2009

Updates From Random Corners in The Circle - 5/18/09

-I continue to have enough diabetic supplies. Yay!

-I continue to buy books faster than I can read them. This needs to stop.

-I recently completed a full spandex outfit that I can wear when I ride my bicycle. Yay?

-I signed up to take velodrome lessons in June. I can finally put my track bike to good use!

-I’m getting plenty of overtime at work. Yay!

-I recently purged my music library of all of my God Lives Underwater and Guns ‘N Roses albums, two bands that had a lot of influence in shaping my high school music tastes. I just don’t listen to them any more. Progress in my musical tastes?

-House and The Office both ended their fifth season. I think I will keep up with House, not sure about The Office. Pam’s obviously pregnant?

-Somehow I keep managing to find ideas out of which inspiration flows to make comics.

-My brother will be in Europe all summer. Yay!

-Rumor has it that Weezer and Blink 182 will be touring Minnesota this summer. How can I not attend these concerts!?

-This image still thoroughly angers me in ways I can't even begin to describe!


Pew Pew Pew!

Take THAT, Spirit of Christmas!


_DZ


submit to reddit